Trump’s threat to invoke the Insurrection Act against protesters is not about restoring order—it is about silencing dissent and shielding federal abuse from accountability. The Insurrection Act was designed for extraordinary circumstances, not as a blunt instrument to crush citizens who are protesting government misconduct. To wield it against the public is to turn the Constitution on its head.
Across the country, Americans are reacting to documented abuses by federal agents—violent raids, excessive force, and intimidation carried out in the name of “law and order.” Instead of addressing these grievances through transparency, investigation, and reform, Trump responds with threats of military-style repression. That is the reflex of an autocrat, not a democratic leader.
Invoking the Insurrection Act would blur the line between civilian governance and martial rule. It would normalize the idea that protest equals rebellion, that accountability equals chaos. History shows where this logic leads: once a president claims the power to deploy federal force against political opposition, no protest is safe, no right secure.
Democracy does not survive on fear. It survives on restraint, law, and the consent of the governed. Threatening to unleash the Insurrection Act to protect abusive agents is a confession of failure—and a warning. When leaders fear their own people, it is not the people who are in rebellion. It is power that has lost its legitimacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment